People v. Pillar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to a different judge because the trial court placed blame on counsel and the parties for certain events, was “really upset” with the parties, and made inadequate findings some of which had no factual underpinnings
• “Given the certainty and vigor with which the trial judge expressed her findings, . . . we are convinced that the judge would have difficulty setting side her previously expressed views and justly resolve the issue at a subsequent hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).