California Court of Appeal· 2/22/2006
People v. Herrera
Citations
- 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 578
- 136 Cal. App. 4th 1191
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1530
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 2103
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to hold that “the corpus delicti rule should not apply to preliminary hearings” because the court was “not willing to turn [its] back on a long and unbroken line of cases that have applied the rule to preliminary hearings”
- refusing to hold that “the corpus delicti rule should not apply to preliminary hearings” because the court was “not willing to turn [its] back on a long and unbroken line of cases that have applied the rule to preliminary hearings”
- “[W]e . . . are unwilling to blaze a new trail after the courts have followed a single path for decades. If appropriate, any such change of direction is better left to the Supreme Court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ikola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Polanski v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-12-21· cited 33×
- People v. PLENGSANGTIPCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-03-19· cited 28×
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-10-08· cited 23×
- People v. POWERS-MONACHELLOCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-10-20· cited 11×
- People v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-01-07· cited 11×
- State v. HardyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-10-18· cited 8×
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-01-09· cited 5×
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
- State v. HardyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-01-06· cited 2×
- Lucent Technologies v. State Board of Equaliz.California Court of Appeal· 2015-11-03
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-10-25
- Munoz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2020-02-26
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-09-01
- People v. BarooshianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2024-04-16
- People v. ArmasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2024-12-11
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-11-12· cited 665×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 360×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-11-02· cited 282×
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-08-07· cited 279×
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 219×
- People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 181×
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 152×
- People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-05-02· cited 133×
- People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court· 1993-12-20· cited 108×
- People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 86×
- People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court· 1983-04-25· cited 78×
- People v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-12-17· cited 66×
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-01-18· cited 46×
- People v. ScheidtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-06-13· cited 40×
- Salazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-08-18· cited 36×
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-08-27· cited 35×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-09-12· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.