California Supreme Court· 8/7/1986
People v. Pearson
Citations
- 721 P.2d 595
- 42 Cal. 3d 351
- 228 Cal. Rptr. 509
- 1986 Cal. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 654(a) of the California Penal Code — which prior to being amended in 1997 contained language identical to that in title 14, section 104 — prohibits multiple punishments based on a single act or an indivisible course of conduct
- “[W]hen multiple convictions are based on a single act. . . or an indivisible course of conduct, the use of such convictions must not result in the defendant being ‘punished under more than one’ Penal Code provision.”
- \stay\ serves to comply with prohibition against multiple punishments
- court found reversal of properly stayed count \unnecessary\
- “stay” serves to comply with prohibition against multiple punishments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk, Lucas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 1,878×
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 794×
- People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 422×
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-03· cited 395×
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-05-22· cited 350×
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-03-29· cited 306×
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-01-13· cited 247×
- People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-01-31· cited 229×
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 229×
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-02-08· cited 187×
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 152×
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-05-14· cited 139×
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 134×
- People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-05-02· cited 133×
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-02-05· cited 133×
- People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-10· cited 128×
- People v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-08-16· cited 126×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 115×
- People v. VidanaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-08-18· cited 112×
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 111×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-13· cited 950×
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-12-03· cited 552×
- People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-01-04· cited 538×
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-03-11· cited 443×
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-20· cited 375×
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-09-17· cited 336×
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-01-20· cited 262×
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-06-06· cited 247×
- People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-04-20· cited 237×
- People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-12-11· cited 231×
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-04· cited 228×
- People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-07-30· cited 201×
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-04-19· cited 200×
- People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-27· cited 171×
- In Re FossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-14· cited 169×
- In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-01-31· cited 167×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-01-07· cited 151×
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-06-03· cited 149×
- People v. NilesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-06-10· cited 148×
- People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-04-27· cited 126×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.