Illinois Supreme Court· 1/25/1996
People v. Henderson
Citations
- 662 N.E.2d 1287
- 171 Ill. 2d 124
- 215 Ill. Dec. 147
- 1996 Ill. LEXIS 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]rial counsel’s performance cannot be considered deficient because of a failure to present cumulative evidence”
- finding that “[t]rial counsel’s performance cannot be considered deficient because of a failure to present cumulative evidence”
- noting the well-established rule that “courts may take judicial notice of matters which are commonly known or, if not commonly known, are readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy”
- “Defendant’s trial counsel therefore cannot be faulted for failing to present a medical record which did not exist at the time of the [suppression] hearing.”
- “[C]ourts may take judicial notice of matters which are *** readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy.”
- truancy and lack of interest in education are aggravating
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMorrow, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-26· cited 566×
- People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 377×
- People v. EasleyIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 356×
- People v. WestIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 309×
- People v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 260×
- People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 258×
- People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 234×
- People v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-02-17· cited 212×
- People v. DupreeIllinois Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 209×
- People v. MadejIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 175×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 140×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 135×
- People v. PeeplesIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 126×
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 122×
- People v. FairIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 91×
- Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 70×
- People v. FriebergAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-25· cited 40×
- People v. MataIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 36×
- People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-26· cited 23×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 1,967×
- Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 983×
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 387×
- People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 310×
- People v. EddmondsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 304×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 297×
- People v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 270×
- People v. BarrowIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 241×
- People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-01-24· cited 223×
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 205×
- People v. OrangeIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 195×
- Murdy v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-03· cited 156×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 156×
- People v. ThompkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 146×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-02-03· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.