Skip to main content

People v. Henderson

Citations

  • 662 N.E.2d 1287
  • 171 Ill. 2d 124
  • 215 Ill. Dec. 147
  • 1996 Ill. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]rial counsel’s performance cannot be considered deficient because of a failure to present cumulative evidence”
  • finding that “[t]rial counsel’s performance cannot be considered deficient because of a failure to present cumulative evidence”
  • noting the well-established rule that “courts may take judicial notice of matters which are commonly known or, if not commonly known, are readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy”
  • “Defendant’s trial counsel therefore cannot be faulted for failing to present a medical record which did not exist at the time of the [suppression] hearing.”
  • “[C]ourts may take judicial notice of matters which are *** readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy.”
  • truancy and lack of interest in education are aggravating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.