People v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although copy of search warrant left with person searched was not signed or dated, “it was a technical irregularity, which was not prejudicial to either of the defendants, nor did it affect their substantial rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McClelland
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 20×
• People v. Stokes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-13· cited 17×
• Sternberg v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-08-23· cited 16×
• People v. Blake
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-09-07· cited 15×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-17· cited 15×
• State v. Loudermilk
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-03-04· cited 11×
• People v. One 1968 Cadillac Automobile
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-04-11· cited 9×
• People v. Ybarra
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-02-09· cited 8×
• State v. Stafford
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-27· cited 3×
• People v. Harrison
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-09-22· cited 3×
• People v. Lozada
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-11-23· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Pugh
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-18· cited 28×
• The PEOPLE v. Pigrenet
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-11-30· cited 27×
• The People v. Degeovanni
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1927-06-22· cited 12×
• People v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-02-04· cited 5×
• People v. Perdew
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-12-20· cited 2×