Skip to main content

People v. Gray

Citations

  • 252 Ill. App. 3d 362
  • 192 Ill. Dec. 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor’s characterization of defendant’s theory of the case as “so ridiculous that it isn’t even worthy of comment” not reversible error
  • prosecutor’s characterization of defendant’s theory of the case as “so ridiculous that it isn’t even worthy of comment” not reversible error
  • court would not engage in speculation and conjecture where the defendant established only that two African-Americans were excluded from the jury but failed to preserve the record as to the race of the jury or the other excluded venire members
  • court would not engage in speculation and conjecture where the defendant established only that two African Americans were excluded from the jury but failed to preserve the record as to the race of the jury or the other excluded venire members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill, Hoffman, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.