People v. Peter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding comments “concerning the lack of evidence contradicting the evidence the State had offered on the subject of fingerprints” did not shift the burden of proof to the defendant
• relevant evidence is that “which tend[s] to make the proposition at issue more or less probable”
• trial court did not abuse discretion by refusing to permit cross-examination on this point
• trial court did not abuse discretion by refusing to permit cross-examination on this point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).