People v. Figures

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding insufficient evidence of great bodily harm where the defendant fired a shot at the victim, which pierced the victim’s shoe but did not penetrate his skin
• construing “great bodily harm” in the context of the aggravated battery statute
• construing \great bodily harm\ in the context of the aggravated battery statute
• whether the victim’s injuries constitute great bodily harm is “neither dependent upon hospitalization of the victim, nor the permanency of his disability or disfigurement”
• whether the victim's injuries constitute great bodily harm is `neither dependent upon hospitalization of the victim, nor the permanency of his disability or disfigurement'
• whether the victim’s injuries constitute great bodily harm is ‘neither dependent upon hospitalization of the victim, nor the permanency of his disability or disfigurement’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).