Illinois Supreme Court· 7/26/2001
People v. Rogers
Citations
- 756 N.E.2d 831
- 197 Ill. 2d 216
- 258 Ill. Dec. 557
- 2001 Ill. LEXIS 1031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dismissal of postconviction petition is appropriate where the record from original trial proceedings contradicts the defendant’s allegations and shows the petition is without merit
- holding that dismissal of postconviction petition is appropriate where the record from original trial proceedings contradicts the defendant's allegations and shows the petition is without merit
- noting any issues which could have been raised on direct appeal are forfeited during postconviction proceedings
- stating, “We have consistently upheld the dismissal of a post-conviction petition when the record from the original trial proceedings contradicts the defendant’s allegations.”
- Illinois courts have \consistently upheld the dismissal of a post-conviction petition when the record from the original trial proceedings contradicts the defendant's allegations\
- Illinois courts have “consistently upheld the dismissal of a post-conviction petition when the record from the original trial proceedings contradicts the defendant’s allegations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-06-03· cited 468×
- People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 350×
- People v. AddisonIllinois Supreme Court· 2023-04-20· cited 207×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 205×
- People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 135×
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-02-17· cited 93×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-03-05· cited 75×
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-10-27· cited 65×
- People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-04-21· cited 65×
- People v. ReyesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-11· cited 59×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-27· cited 59×
- People v. LittleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-08· cited 48×
- People v. WoodardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-20· cited 42×
- People v. DeloneyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-30· cited 41×
- People v. McGheeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-19· cited 38×
- People v. ColeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-21· cited 38×
- People v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-03-31· cited 37×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-20· cited 33×
- People v. JeffersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-26· cited 33×
- People v. ValadovinosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-12· cited 31×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. StaceyIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-09-21· cited 745×
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 421×
- People v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 354×
- People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 310×
- People v. WestIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 309×
- People v. WagenerIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-01· cited 218×
- People v. CarneyIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 169×
- People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 150×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 51×
- People v. CreteIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 27×
- People v. HannaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-05-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.