Skip to main content

People v. Estrada

Citations

  • 601 P.2d 619
  • 198 Colo. 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prosecutorial discretion between two statutes proscribing identical conduct with different penalties violates state constitutional principles of equal protection
  • finding that “a penalty scheme that provides widely divergent sentences for similar conduct and intent to be irrational”
  • finding that \a penalty scheme that provides widely divergent sentences for similar conduct and intent to be irrational\
  • equal protection is inherent in the state constitution’s due process clause and is violated if widely divergent sentences are mandated for statutory offenses proscribing the same conduct
  • equal protection is inherent in the state constitution's due process clause and is violated if widely divergent sentences are mandated for statutory offenses proscribing the same conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.