Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/21/2006

Smolinski v. Vojta

Citations

  • 844 N.E.2d 989
  • 363 Ill. App. 3d 752
  • 300 Ill. Dec. 546
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband could not collaterally attack judgment under § 2-1401 on issue that was fully raised before the trial court and could have been raised on direct appeal regardless of whether he sought one
  • stating that, when presented with an insufficient record, we will indulge every reasonable presumption in favor of the judgment appealed from
  • noting that, “when the record on appeal is incomplete, a reviewing court should actually ‘indulge in every reasonable presumption favorable to the judgment from which the appeal is taken, including that the trial court ruled or acted correctly’ ”
  • noting the circuit court order stated it was \ 'fully advised in the premises' \
  • noting the circuit court order stated it was “ ‘fully advised in the premises’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Smolinski v. Vojta

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.