Smolinski v. Vojta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that husband could not collaterally attack judgment under § 2-1401 on issue that was fully raised before the trial court and could have been raised on direct appeal regardless of whether he sought one
• stating that, when presented with an insufficient record, we will indulge every reasonable presumption in favor of the judgment appealed from
• noting that, “when the record on appeal is incomplete, a reviewing court should actually ‘indulge in every reasonable presumption favorable to the judgment from which the appeal is taken, including that the trial court ruled or acted correctly’ ”
• noting the circuit court order stated it was \ 'fully advised in the premises' \
• noting the circuit court order stated it was “ ‘fully advised in the premises’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).