Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/22/2008

People v. Echols

Citations

887 N.E.2d 793
382 Ill. App. 3d 309
320 Ill. Dec. 649
2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

testimony about investigative alert does not support defendant’s argument that State improperly elicited evidence from which jury could infer that he was in a gang
testimony about investigative alert does not support defendant’s argument that State improperly elicited evidence from which jury could infer that he was in a gang
testimony about investigative alert does not support defendant’s argument that State improperly elicited evidence from which jury could infer that he was in a gang
elements of theft are: (1) the intent to obtain unauthorized control over the property of another and (2) the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the use or benefit of the property
elements of theft are: (1) the intent to obtain unauthorized control over the property of another and (2) the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the use or benefit of the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karnezis, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.