People v. Duren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lawyers’ affidavits stating that the lawyers did not receive information related to the matter in litigation from their former partner, the movant’s attorney, “clearly and effectively” rebutted the presumption of disclosure arising by virtue of former partnership
• 2.25 hours of work sufficient to disqualify former 13 counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).