People v. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the victim’s statements to a sexual assault examination nurse were admissible pursuant to MRE 803(4)
• “Former testimony is admissible at trial under both MRE 804(b)(1) and the Confrontation Clause as long as the witness is unavailable for trial and was subject to cross-examination during the prior testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).