People v. Drossart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the expert may not tell the jury how to decide the case, but may offer an opinion on an ultimate issue where the expert’s experience and training is in an area that is largely unfamiliar to the jury
• “[I]t is important that the expert witness not be permitted to testify about the requirements of law which apply to the particular facts in the case or to phrase his opinion in terms of a legal conclusion.”
• “[I]t is important that the expert witness not be permitted to testify about the requirements of law which apply to the particular facts in the case or to phrase his opinion in terms of a legal conclusion.”
• “[I]t is important that the expert witness not be permitted to testify about the requirements of law which apply to the particular facts in the case or to phrase his opinion in terms of a legal conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).