Skip to main content
· 9/29/2004

City of Kalamazoo v. Kts Industries, Inc

Citations

  • 687 N.W.2d 319
  • 263 Mich. App. 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • resolving a direct conflict Corrections Comm., 313 Mich. 352, 356, between two statutes in favor of the 21 N.W.2d 159 (1946). subsequently enacted legislation
  • resolving a direct conflict between two statutes in favor of the subsequently enacted legislation
  • resolving a direct conflict between two statutes in favor of the subsequently enacted legislation
  • resolving a direct conflict believe that the lead opinion has persuasively explained between two statutes in favor of the subsequently enacted why the BTA did not impliedly amend or repeal the legislation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jansen, Markey, Gage

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.