People v. Dodson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Cronic review warranted when defense counsel did not mount a true challenge to the State’s case, in an effort to procure leniency
• defense counsel offered no argument on the sufficiency of the evidence in presenting the State-drafted stipulation, whose content \virtually ensured a conviction\; the \stipulated bench trial provided a process to judgment that lost its character as a confrontation between adversaries\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Vaughn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-23· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Velez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-07-16· cited 9×
• People v. Madison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-10-11· cited 5×
• People v. Clendenin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-18· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• United States v. Cronic
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
• People v. Hattery
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 248×
• Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State Reformatory
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-04-24· cited 185×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-29· cited 85×
• People v. Lefler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-01-22· cited 32×