Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/29/1996

People v. Moore

Citations

663 N.E.2d 490
279 Ill. App. 3d 152
215 Ill. Dec. 479
1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

in analyzing the prejudice prong of Strickland, the reviewing court should consider “the fundamental fairness of the proceeding as a whole”
in analyzing the prejudice prong of Strickland, the reviewing court should consider “the fundamental fairness of the proceeding as a whole”
“sound trial strategy *** embraces the use of established rules of evidence and procedure to avoid, when possible the admission of incriminating statements, harmful opinions, and prejudicial facts.”
we presume that “[s]ound trial strategy” “embraces the use of established rules”
“The genesis of the standard for judging the prejudice necessary to elevate counsel’s performance to a level of constitutional deprivation parroted the standard for judging materiality of undisclosed evidence favorable to an accused.”
“[t]he question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different result without the professional errors of counsel but whether, with their presence, he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuehn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.