Skip to main content

People v. Hattery

Citations

  • 488 N.E.2d 513
  • 109 Ill. 2d 449
  • 94 Ill. Dec. 514
  • 1985 Ill. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing explicit statement that defendant did everything the State described in opening statement as concession of guilt
  • defense counsel is per se ineffective where counsel concedes defendant's guilt, unless the record shows that the defendant knowingly and intelligently consented to this strategy
  • counsel may not concede client's guilt without client's consent in the hope of obtaining a more lenient sentence where a plea of not guilty has been entered
  • counsel may not concede client's guilt without client's consent in the hope of obtaining a more lenient sentence where a plea of not guilty has been entered
  • by conceding defendant's guilt, counsel failed to subject prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing
  • no meaningful adversarial testing where defense counsel conceded guilt in opening statement, advanced no theory of defense at trial, presented no evidence, and did not make a closing argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

150 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Hattery

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.