Michigan Court of Appeals· 9/22/2015

People v. Corbin

Citations

312 Mich. App. 352
880 N.W.2d 2
2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “the prosecution has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the amount of the victim’s loss”
relating to restitution orders specifically, “[a] trial court may abuse its discretion by blurring the distinction between a civil remedy for damages and the criminal penalty of restitution.”
“Where the evidence provides a reasonably certain factual foundation for a restitution amount, the statutory standard is met.”
“Nor is restitution properly awarded for losses paid by insurance.”
describing factual and proximate causation
describing factual and proximate causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gleicher, Kelly, Servitto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.