Colorado Court of Appeals· 11/19/1992

People v. Clouse

Citations

859 P.2d 228
16 Brief Times Rptr. 1793
1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 422
1992 WL 338632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that any error was harmless, but also finding no actual prejudice had been sustained to defendant
relying on Hollis in holding that there was no “possible prejudice” to the defendant when the jury was sworn in after two of the prosecution’s witnesses had testified
in case where the jury was sworn during the prosecution’s case, the court held that the error was harmless
“failure to swear in the jury at this stage of the trial constituted harmless error” because “[t]he record confirms that the jury was sworn in long before deliberations, and the trial court informed the jury that the oath applied retroactively”
“failure to swear in the jury at this stage of the trial constituted harmless error” because “[t]he record confirms that the jury was sworn in long before deliberations, and the trial court informed the jury that the oath applied retroactively”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruland, Pierce, Van Cise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.