People v. Schoondermark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that “defendant’s arms came in contact with [the arresting officers] during [his] various struggles” with the officers was sufficient to support a finding that he had applied physical force
• defining the violent application of physical force as the “abnormally sudden and intense use of physical strength against a peace officer”
• finding sufficient evidence to support a defendant’s conviction of second degree assault where the defendant “struggled violently” against the officers who restrained him, while noting that the defendant basically conceded his conduct was violent
• officer testimony that the defendant’s “arms came in contact” with the officers was sufficient to support a conviction of second degree assault against a peace officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).