Skip to main content

People v. Cintron

Citations

  • 75 N.Y.2d 249
  • 551 N.E.2d 561
  • 552 N.Y.S.2d 68
  • 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “face-to-face confrontation with the defendant is not an absolute requirement under either the Federal or State Constitution” and rejecting a facial challenge to a statute allowing two-way video testimony of child sex abuse witnesses
  • rejecting facial challenge under the State and Federal Constitutions to a statute allowing two- way video testimony of child witnesses in sex abuse cases
  • expert testimony not required to establish child’s vulnerability to allow for use of closed circuit-television

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Bellacosa, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.