People v. Christiansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the equal protection claim for capital defendants seeking allocution before a death penalty jury
• rejecting the equal protection claim for capital defendants seeking allocution before a death penalty jury
• supreme court will not lightly overturn trial court’s findings during aggravation and mitigation phase of death penalty hearing
• death penalty appropriate despite mitigating evidence of emotional and mental disturbance, alcoholism, drug addiction, poor health, deprived childhood, and remorse
• death penalty appropriate despite mitigating evidence of emotional and mental disturbance, alcoholism, drug addiction, poor health, deprived childhood, and remorse
• death penalty appropriate despite mitigating evidence of emotional and mental disturbance, alcoholism, drug addiction, poor health, deprived childhood, and remorse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Christiansen

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-12-12· cited 28×
• People v. Christiansen
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1922-11-02· cited 9×
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-05-22· cited 8×
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-04-24· cited 5×
• People v. Christiansen
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1970-03-12· cited 2×
• People v. Christiansen
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-30· cited 1×
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-12-23
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1966-02-07
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-07-20
• People v. Christiansen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-12-22