People v. Carrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There is a real question whether the defendant's claim that the evidence against him was `not overwhelming' is equivalent to the `factually close' standard\ under prong-one of plain error.
• “There is a real question whether the defendant’s claim that the evidence against him was ‘not overwhelming’ is equivalent to the ‘factually close’ standard” under prong one of plain error.
• \There is a real question whether the defendant's claim that the evidence against him was `not overwhelming' is equivalent to the `factually close' standard\ under prong one of plain error.
• all finding that the erroneous instruction was harmless because the evidence was not closely balanced and the outcome of the case would not have been different had the jury been instructed properly
• \There is a real question whether the defendant's claim that the evidence against him was 'not overwhelming' is equivalent to the 'factually close' standard\ under prong-one of plain error.
• “There is a real question whether the defendant’s claim that the evidence against him was ‘not overwhelming’ is equivalent to the ‘factually close’ standard” under prong one of plain error.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).