Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/5/2004

People v. James

Citations

810 N.E.2d 96
284 Ill. Dec. 443
348 Ill. App. 3d 498
2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating determination of whether alibi evidence might have affected a jury verdict and prejudiced a defendant is made by reviewing the potential impact of the alibi evidence against the overall evidence of guilt
“the State has no obligation to prove motive” (citing People v. Smith, 141 Ill. 2d 40, 56 (1990))
\the State has no obligation to prove motive\ (citing People v. Smith, 141 Ill. 2d 40, 56 (1990))
\the State has no obligation to prove motive\ (citing People v. Smith, 141 Ill. 2d 40, 56 (1990))
“a tattoo was not testimonial in nature and the defendant’s sixth amendment right to confrontation was not violated where a nontestifying codefendant’s gang tattoos were displayed to the jury”
“severance is necessary when one defendant has made out-of-court admissions that implicate a codefendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karnezis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.