Skip to main content
· 5/21/2004

People v. Campobello

Citations

  • 810 N.E.2d 307
  • 284 Ill. Dec. 654
  • 348 Ill. App. 3d 619
  • 123 A.L.R. 5th 761
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is proper for a party to test the correctness of an otherwise unappealable discovery order through contempt proceedings initiated by the party’s refusal to comply with the discovery order and its subsequent appeal of the contempt sanction
  • noting that it is proper for a party to test the correctness of an otherwise unappealable discovery order through contempt proceedings initiated by the party’s refusal to comply with the discovery order and its subsequent appeal of the contempt sanction
  • contentions must be supported by reasons and citation to authority or will be deemed forfeited
  • el requerimiento se limitaba al expediente personal del sacerdote y no abarcaba información sensitiva de las víctimas
  • “[T]he trial court erred in holding that the privilege extends only to admissions or confessions made in a one-on-one setting.”
  • “The State has neither expressed nor implied an aim to determine for itself whether defendant violated canon law, much less to override any determination of the Diocese on that point.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.