Illinois Supreme Court· 7/26/2001

Norskog v. Pfiel

Citations

755 N.E.2d 1
197 Ill. 2d 60
257 Ill. Dec. 899
2001 Ill. LEXIS 1035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a plaintiff must show that a parent was “aware of specific instances of prior conduct sufficient to put them on notice that the act complained of (in [that] case, [a] murder) was likely to occur”
holding that a plaintiff must show that a parent was “aware of specific instances of prior conduct sufficient to put them on notice that the act complained of (in [that] case, [a] murder) was likely to occur”
permitting the appeal of an “order finding a person or entity in contempt of court”
observing “[t]hat a high value is placed on privacy is evidenced by the fact that the privilege afforded a recipient of mental health treatment continues even after the recipient’s death”
observing “[t]hat a high value is placed on privacy is evidenced by the fact that the privilege afforded a recipient of mental health treatment continues even after the -8- 1-19-0925 recipient’s death”
defendant who participated in a court-ordered fitness-to-stand-trial exam for his murder trial did not waive Act confidentiality in a subsequent wrongful death civil action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Norskog v. Pfiel

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.