Mandziara v. Canulli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that “[t]he nature and extent” of any damages arising from violations of section 10(d) of the Act should be determined by a trier of fact
• approving of Renzi and noting that common law “ ‘must give way’ ” to the statutory protections of the Act
• approving of Renzi and noting that common law \must give way\ to the statutory protections of the Act
• plaintiff did not affirmatively place her mental health condition at issue, her husband, through his lawyer, did
• litigation privilege does not provide defense for violation of statute that is carefully drawn to maintain the confidentiality of mental health records
• plaintiff in a custody case did not place her mental health in issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).