Skip to main content

People v. Brooks

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 626
  • 345 Ill. App. 3d 945
  • 281 Ill. Dec. 222
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding it improper for a prosecutor to tell jurors that the defendant’s “cloak of innocence” is now gone
  • finding it improper for a prosecutor to tell jurors that the defendant’s “cloak of innocence” is now gone
  • “the number of times the jury is confronted with a misstatement of law is relevant in evaluating the nature and extent of the harm”
  • a reviewing court will not reverse a jury’s verdict based on improper remarks made during closing arguments unless the comments resulted in substantial prejudice to the defendant and constituted a material factor in his conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard, Gallagher, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.