Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/16/2004
People v. Brooks
Citations
- 803 N.E.2d 626
- 345 Ill. App. 3d 945
- 281 Ill. Dec. 222
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding it improper for a prosecutor to tell jurors that the defendant’s “cloak of innocence” is now gone
- finding it improper for a prosecutor to tell jurors that the defendant’s “cloak of innocence” is now gone
- “the number of times the jury is confronted with a misstatement of law is relevant in evaluating the nature and extent of the harm”
- a reviewing court will not reverse a jury’s verdict based on improper remarks made during closing arguments unless the comments resulted in substantial prejudice to the defendant and constituted a material factor in his conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frossard, Gallagher, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 1,578×
- People v. CoxAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-11-21· cited 56×
- People v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-02· cited 49×
- People v. PhaganAppellate Court of Illinois· 2019-09-05· cited 48×
- People v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-26· cited 39×
- People v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-17· cited 38×
- People v. McGeeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-01-29· cited 37×
- People v. GutierrezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 36×
- People v. Keith C.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-27· cited 30×
- People v. CarbajalAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-03-07· cited 26×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-07-10· cited 25×
- People v. WeatherspoonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-09· cited 21×
- People v. NunnAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-10· cited 20×
- People v. ClayAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-02-19· cited 16×
- People v. ChatmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-04-11· cited 16×
- People v. McLaurinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-16· cited 10×
- People v. HillsmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-07· cited 8×
- People v. WasmundAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-11-09· cited 6×
- State v. EldredIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-09-09· cited 1×
- People v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-07
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- People v. KeeneIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 416×
- People v. CrespoIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-03-31· cited 340×
- People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 336×
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 284×
- People v. CisewskiIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 239×
- The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 220×
- People v. ViserIllinois Supreme Court· 1975-09-26· cited 183×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 156×
- People v. AlvineIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-09-26· cited 85×
- People v. OdleIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 66×
- The People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1963-09-27· cited 65×
- People v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-08· cited 61×
- People v. ToneyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-31· cited 52×
- People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-22· cited 26×
- People v. TomesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-30· cited 21×
- People v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-11-09· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.