Skip to main content

People v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 924 N.E.2d 998
  • 392 Ill. App. 3d 689
  • 338 Ill. Dec. 472
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant was consciously aware that an officer was practically certain to suffer bodily harm where the defendant sped off in his vehicle and the defendant’s side mirror struck the officer who had been standing next to the defendant’s vehicle
  • distinguishing the defendant’s offense from one involving the use of a firearm, as Belk found that a “crucial distinction” and suggested that the presence of a firearm may determine whether a crime is a forcible felony (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[I]nferences as to defendant’s mental state are a matter particularly within the province of the jury.”
  • whether the defendant acts knowingly may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, and inferences as to the defendant’s mental state are a matter particularly within the province of the jury
  • whether the defendant acts knowingly may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, and inferences as to the defendant’s mental state are a matter particularly within the province of the jury
  • only enumerated aggravated batteries qualify as forcible felonies under section 2—8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.