Skip to main content

People v. Schmitz

Citations

  • 55 Cal. 4th 909
  • 288 P.3d 1259
  • 149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 640
  • 2012 WL 5990981
  • 2012 Cal. LEXIS 11006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a parolee, who is only a passenger in a third-party’s vehicle, is in control of areas within his reach in the passenger compartment
  • noting that a search of a probationer’s residence is limited to areas where “the probationer has complete or joint control over”
  • noting that the scope of a parole search is not “strictly tied to the literal wording of the notification given to the parolee upon release”
  • search of shoes and bag of chips in the backseat of a car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan, Werdegar, Liu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Schmitz

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.