Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/12/2006

People v. Bingham

Citations

847 N.E.2d 903
364 Ill. App. 3d 642
301 Ill. Dec. 893
2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the case, involving a far less serious crime, “progressed quickly,” as it had “been pending only three months”
finding “no indication” that purpose of request dilatory where case pending three months and no prior continuances or pretrial motions filed
finding “no indication” that purpose of request dilatory where case pending three months and no prior continuances or pretrial motions filed
distinguishing between the nature of the review of a denial of a request for a continuance depending on whether the request implicates the right to choice of counsel
finding \no indication\ that purpose of request was dilatory where defendant's case had been pending only three months and no prior continuances or pretrial motions had been filed
“the trial court’s denial of a defendant’s request for a continuance [to substitute counsel] will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.