Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 23 a claim is not exhausted unless the petitioner has presented to the state court the same operative 24 facts and legal theory upon which his federal claim is based
• “When reviewing the denial of a motion to substitute counsel for abuse of discretion, we consider the following three factors..,. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).