Colorado Court of Appeals· 11/24/2010
People v. Allen
Citations
- 310 P.3d 83
- 2010 WL 4782249
- 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 1743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a district court abuses its discretion in denying a Crim. P. 32(d) motion if its decision is manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair
- se lected for official publication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gabriel, Hawthorne, Roy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. FinleyColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-02-09· cited 585×
- People v. ChippewaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-02-08· cited 369×
- People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-09-14· cited 352×
- Leyva v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-05-12· cited 336×
- Patton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-11-13· cited 259×
- People v. CookColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-10-16· cited 111×
- In re the 2000-2001 District Grand Jury in & for the First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-09-13· cited 46×
- Askew v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-12-03· cited 43×
- People v. TuffoColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 36×
- People v. SteadColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 32×
- People v. TixierColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-10-16· cited 28×
- People v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-02-27· cited 16×
- People v. RowlandColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-01-08· cited 14×
- United States v. HolderTenth Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 11×
- United States v. Malich Chike Reed, United States of America v. Malich Chike ReedFifth Circuit· 2004-08-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.