People v. Rowland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statutory sexually violent predator community notification requirement did not impose punishment and, therefore, did not violate the Sixth Amendment under Apprendi
• concluding that where a sentence is not punitive in nature, Apprendi is inapplicable
• concluding that the Sixth Amendment right to have certain facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt does not apply to the sexually violent predator community notification requirement because such notification is not punitive
• concluding that where a sentence is not punitive, Apprendi is inapplicable
• “Like numerous other courts, we conclude that, under the [relevant] factors, [the defendant] has not been subjected to additional punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allen v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2013-07-01· cited 196×
• People v. Mendoza
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-10-13· cited 187×
• v. Williamson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2021-06-04· cited 170×
• People v. Carbajal
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05· cited 23×
• People v. Heisler
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 16×
• in Interest of T.B
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
• v. Pellegrin
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2021-09-02· cited 5×
• People v. Allen
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-11-24· cited 5×
• People v. Gallegos
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-09-17· cited 4×
• People v. Brosh
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-12-27· cited 4×