Skip to main content
· 6/4/1980

People v. Briddle

Citations

  • 405 N.E.2d 1357
  • 84 Ill. App. 3d 523
  • 40 Ill. Dec. 265
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reinstating a perjury prosecution against a defendant for statements he made in traffic court about the kind of car he was driving when he was pulled over for speeding, even though he was acquitted of the speeding charge
  • reinstating a perjury prosecution against a defendant for statements he made in traffic court about the kind of car he was driving when he was pulled over for speeding, even though he was acquitted of the speeding charge
  • prosecution for perjury not barred where defendant’s testimony in prior trial was irrelevant to the charges against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.