Hardwick v. Hardwick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• If an employer “makes a contribution to a retirement fund as an employment benefit or as a form of additional compensation ... the contribution is marital property. ...”
• where tidal court valued retirement plans as stated on the husband’s financial declaration, and husband offered no other values or evidence on liquidation, court did not error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilburn v. Wilburn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-12-04· cited 45×
• Dodge v. Dodge
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-04-20· cited 30×
• Mazzone v. Miles
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 22×
• Shorb v. Shorb
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-19· cited 17×
• Belton v. Belton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 10×
• Pendergast v. Pendergast
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 6×
• Chanko v. Chanko
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 6×
• West v. West
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-05-10· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
• Kneece v. Kneece
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 25×
• Martin v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 18×
• Phillips v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 16×
• Skipper v. Skipper
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-17· cited 11×
• Graham v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-02-20· cited 11×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Hyatt
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-12· cited 7×