Levine v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting the denial of a motion to discharge habitual DWLS might have been dispositive if the- State had agreed that it had no way of presenting sufficient evidence of predicate offenses without the tainted case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Batista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-21· cited 6×
• Pena v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-12· cited 5×
• Hawley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-26· cited 5×
• Garcia-Roque v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-30· cited 1×
• Churchill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-24· cited 1×
• Hawley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-14· cited 1×
• Peña v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-12· cited 1×
• Camerota v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-27· cited 1×
• Whitsett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-19
• Foster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Raulerson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-13· cited 63×
• State v. Keirn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-06· cited 27×
• Vaughn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-31· cited 16×
• Weber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-13· cited 9×
• Zambuto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-17· cited 7×