Skip to main content

Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 694 So. 2d 61
  • 1997 WL 174345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the jury must decide whether a continuing tort occurred where the plaintiff alleged that the defendant continued to make false representations
  • holding that the jury must decide whether a continuing tort occurred where the plaintiff alleged that the defendant continued to make false representations
  • holding: “Whether the continuing torts doctrine applies to the facts of a case is for a trier of fact to decide”
  • economic loss rule does not bar claims where there is no contract between the parties
  • \The economic loss doctrine precludes parties to a contract to recover economic damages resulting from a breach of contract.\
  • \Whether the continuing torts doctrine applies to the facts of a case is for a trier of fact to decide.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.