Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting similar language in Federal Automobile Dealers Day in Court Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1221, holding that minority stockholder of dealer company in which Ford was majority stockholder did not qualify as “automobile dealer” for purposes of standing to sue under statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-08-24· cited 41×
• Davidson v. General Motors Corp.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-03-25· cited 23×
• Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-14· cited 22×
• Bahig F. Bishay v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2005-04-07· cited 5×
• Coffee v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
  S.D. Georgia· 1998-05-19· cited 5×
• Salem Mall Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-03-14· cited 2×
• Brooks v. St. John's Motor Sales, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1971-07-20· cited 59×
• Daniel F. Kavanaugh, Also Known as Dan Kavanaugh v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1965-11-18· cited 57×
• Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.
  N.D. Florida· 1994-09-30· cited 7×