Aristide v. JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable doctrine of contra non valentem did not apply to medical malpractice statute of repose providing seven-year time limit even where the cause of action was not discovered due to fraud or concealment
• holding that equitable doctrine of contra non valentem did not apply to medical malpractice statute of repose providing seven-year time limit even where the cause of action was not discovered due to fraud or concealment
• affirming dismissal of suit because the plaintiff “failed to follow procedural pre-suit requirements and the suit is barred by sovereign immunity”
• affirming dismissal of complaint and concluding that “the suit is barred by sovereign immunity, because the suit was clearly filed outside the statutorily prescribed time limits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).