Skip to main content
N.D. Illinois· 2/22/2016

Payton v. Kale Realty, LLC

Citations

  • 164 F. Supp. 3d 1050
  • 64 Communications Reg. (P&F) 383
  • 2016 WL 703869
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to the question of “whether the three emails in which Payton provided his cellular number to Patterson amount to prior express consent for Kale to send Payton a text message” as “a legal question”
  • “[C]onsent under the TCPA does not have an expiration date and is considered effective until revoked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lefkow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.