· 1/10/2011
Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.
Citations
- 629 F.3d 697
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 495
- 2011 WL 61649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, at summary judgment, district courts “are not required to draw every requested inference . . . [and] must only draw reasonable ones that are supported by the record”
- noting that credibility determinations are the province of the jury
- at the summary judgment stage, the court cannot “weigh conflicting evidence” or “make credibility determinations,” as this is “the province of the jury”
- at the summary judgment stage, the court cannot “weigh conflicting evidence” or “make credibility determinations,” as this is “the province of the jury”
- plaintiff could not amend the complaint through summary judgment briefing to add an analytically distinct claim
- “[D]istrict courts presiding over summary judgment proceedings may not weigh conflicting evidence, or make credibility determinations, both of which are the province of the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Tinder, Griesbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.