Skip to main content
· 1/10/2011

Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 629 F.3d 697
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 495
  • 2011 WL 61649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, at summary judgment, district courts “are not required to draw every requested inference . . . [and] must only draw reasonable ones that are supported by the record”
  • noting that credibility determinations are the province of the jury
  • at the summary judgment stage, the court cannot “weigh conflicting evidence” or “make credibility determinations,” as this is “the province of the jury”
  • at the summary judgment stage, the court cannot “weigh conflicting evidence” or “make credibility determinations,” as this is “the province of the jury”
  • plaintiff could not amend the complaint through summary judgment briefing to add an analytically distinct claim
  • “[D]istrict courts presiding over summary judgment proceedings may not weigh conflicting evidence, or make credibility determinations, both of which are the province of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Tinder, Griesbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.