Ron Golan v. Veritas Entertainment, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that receipt of two brief unsolicited robocalls as voicemail messages was sufficient to establish standing under TCPA
• elaborating that telemarketing “occurs when the context of a call indicates that it was initiated and transmitted to a person for the purpose of promoting property, goods, or services”
• rejecting defendants’ argument that courts “should consider only the content of the calls in determining whether they were [made for a prohibited purpose]”
• concluding the calls’ “purpose controlled whether they were ‘telemarketing’”
• concluding the calls’ “purpose controlled whether they were ‘telemarketing’”
• concluding the calls’ “purpose controlled whether they were ‘telemarketing’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).