Skip to main content
· 10/13/1998

Paulson v. Centier Bank

Citations

  • 704 N.E.2d 482
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 1768
  • 1998 WL 754455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the promissory note in question was dated prior to the enactment of the statute and therefore outside its scope
  • “A brief should not only present the issues to be decided, but it should also be of material assistance to [a] court in deciding those issues”
  • addressing the relationship between a lender and a borrower

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Staton, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.