Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. v. City of New Haven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because appellant abandoned argument at the trial level, appellant invited any error as to that issue
• concluding that city was “not required to provide a cost estimate greater than zero for capital improvements that are not needed in the annexation area,” where city had policy of making improvements on “as-needed” basis
• “By failing to submit proposed findings with respect to its . . . argument to the trial court, [the appellant] invited any error with respect to that issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).