· 8/30/2000
Epperly v. Johnson
Citations
- 734 N.E.2d 1066
- 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1332
- 2000 WL 1225468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating general rule that “phrases with particularized legal meaning or which are ‘words of art’ require definition when used in jury instructions.”
- constructive fraud action must be premised on “special relationship”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mattingly, Darden, Brook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.