Paulsen v. Paulsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on exception that if outcome of appeal could have no effect on appellant’s right to benefit accepted, its acceptance does not preclude appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Liming v. Liming
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-03· cited 69×
• Edwards v. Edwards
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-01-15· cited 68×
• Becher v. Becher
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2017-06-06· cited 53×
• Velehradsky v. Velehradsky
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-11-02· cited 9×
• Harms v. Harms
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-08-27

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kalkowski v. Kalkowski
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 243×
• Meints v. Meints
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 130×
• Bauerle v. Bauerle
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 51×
• Tyma v. Tyma
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 44×
• Kassebaum v. Kassebaum
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1965-06-11· cited 40×
• State Ex Rel. Z. P. v. Porter
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-05· cited 27×
• Priest v. Priest
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-11-08· cited 27×
• Ainslie v. Ainslie
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-03-22· cited 23×
• Shiers v. Shiers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 16×
• Giese v. Giese
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 6×