Skip to main content
· 3/17/2000

Kalkowski v. Kalkowski

Citations

  • 607 N.W.2d 517
  • 258 Neb. 1035
  • 2000 Neb. LEXIS 58
  • 2000 WL 286269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion in decree that treated growing and stored crops as divisible marital asset and also as income for purposes of child support
  • declining to adopt any bright-line rule regarding the treatment of growing and stored crops as marital assets, the court nonetheless concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in considering growing and stored crops as marital assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.